Related Blog Posts
NIGMS Feedback Loop
- A Shared Responsibility
- Comment on Proposed Pilot to Support NIGMS Investigators’ Overall Research Programs
- Bolstering Our Commitment to Investigator-Initiated Research
Rock Talk
An important, recurring discussion topic on our blogs is ways to maximize the impact and sustainability of NIH-funded biomedical research. In 2011, a Rock Talk post on managing NIH’s budget in fiscally challenging times solicited many comments and led, in part, to an NIH-wide policy on special council review for applications from PIs who have more than $1 million in NIH funding. We have also implemented new programs that provide more stable support for investigators over longer time periods. A more recent example of the “maximizing impact and sustainability” theme is an NIGMS Feedback Loop post that discussed ideas for how to optimize the biomedical research ecosystem.
We’re each leading an NIH-wide working group focused on topics key to this important theme. One group (chaired by Sally) is exploring ways to decrease the time it takes investigators to reach research independence, and the other (chaired by Jon) is looking to develop more efficient and sustainable funding policies and other strategies.
Recently, NIH solicited your comments on an “emeritus award” concept as part of activities of the group chaired by Sally. The group is now in the midst of analyzing all of the comments it received to see what the next steps will be in regard to this type of award.
To inform the efforts of Jon’s group, NIH has just issued a new request for information (RFI) seeking your:
- Input on key issues that currently limit the impact of NIH’s funding for biomedical research and challenge the sustainability of the scientific enterprise.
- Ideas about adjusting current funding policies to ensure both continued impact and sustainability of the NIH research enterprise.
- Ideas for new policies, strategies and other approaches that would increase the impact and sustainability of NIH-funded biomedical research.
- Comments on any other issues that you feel are relevant.
While we read and consider comments responding to our blog posts, in order to make your input part of our formal analysis of RFI responses, it needs to be submitted via the RFI by May 17.
Wow! It is mind boggling that all that is mentioned in the above blurb is how to help scientists who already have NIH funding without addressing the enormous influx of naive young people who think they can ever become NIH funded scientists, or any funded scientist. It is glaringly obvious that the NIH does not care about the legions of young people they are using for 5-10 years, knowing that the vast majority will never find employment in science beyond a postdoc.