Outcomes Analysis of the NIGMS Diversity Supplement Program

1 comment

We recently analyzed outcomes of the NIGMS Research Supplements to Promote Diversity in Health-Related Research (referred to here as the Diversity Supplement Program or DSP), which provides investigators holding active NIGMS research grants with supplemental funds to support scholars from groups underrepresented in biomedical science. Using a public search approach, we could track a large proportion of participants—but not all—through doctoral training and into various careers. We assessed the educational and career outcomes for undergraduate, graduate student and postdoctoral participants supported by supplements between 1989 and 2006, and we encourage you to explore the report.

Highlights of the analysis include:

  • At least 73% of DSP graduate students completed the Ph.D. This completion rate compares quite favorably with national figures of 50-58% Ph.D. completion in all STEM fields by students from underrepresented groups and approximately a 70% Ph.D. overall completion rate in the life sciences.
  • At least 16% of DSP undergraduates earned a Ph.D. and at least 31% earned an M.D. For many undergraduates, the DSP offered a summer research experience at another institution; however, the short duration of a typical undergraduate DSP award may limit its impact on career choice.
  • DSP postdocs were twice as likely as DSP graduate students to have earned their Ph.D. from an institution with substantial enrollment of students from underrepresented groups. This could indicate that the DSP offers postdocs in particular an entry—or re-entry—into research-intensive environments.
  • Careers in research were the most prevalent outcome, with about 65% of all DSP-supported graduate students and postdocs achieving research careers (including academia, industry and government research). DSP participants were employed in career sectors similar to those reported for the U.S.-trained Ph.D. workforce as a whole.

At NIGMS, a DSP award requires a research plan that engages the participant and a career development plan that involves strong mentoring, but the role of the institution is limited. This offers us an opportunity to compare DSP outcomes with trainee outcomes from our institutional training programs that involve participants at similar career stages.

The results of this analysis indicate that the DSP appears to be successful at achieving its intended outcomes and contributing to a larger effort at NIGMS to promote, support and sustain the development of a highly skilled, creative and diverse biomedical research workforce.

One Reply to “Outcomes Analysis of the NIGMS Diversity Supplement Program”

  1. Thanks for doing this study. I hope it will encourage more investigators and PIs to employ this mechanism, because we have a long way to go to succeed in the goal. Bringing more voices, cultures and strengths to the faculty and research enterprise will enhance the outcomes of basic and applied research.

Submit a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.